0397/2024 - Are clusters of physical activity, diet and sedentary behavior associated with mental health in Brazilian older adults?
Agrupamentos de atividade física, dieta e comportamento sedentário estão associados à saúde mental em idosos brasileiros?
Autor:
• Carla Elane Silva dos Santos - Santos, C.E.S - <carlaufsc88@gmail.com>ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-6921
Coautor(es):
• Adalberto Aparecido dos Santos Lopes - Lopes, A.A.S - <aadalberto@hotmail.com>ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3001-6412
• Joel de Almeida Siqueira Junior - Siqueira Junior, J.A - <joelalmeida.ef@gmail.com>
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2368-0446
• Eleonora d’Orsi - d’Orsi, E. - <eleonora@ccs.ufsc.br>
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-1089
• Thiago Sousa Matias - Matias, T.S - <thiagosousamatias@gmail.com>
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-3776
• Cassiano Ricardo Rech - Rech, C.R - <crrech@hotmail.com>
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-3448
Resumo:
This study described the clustering of physical activity (PA), diet quality and sedentary behavior (SB), and examined the associations between these clusters and depressive symptoms and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in Brazilian older adults. The sample consisted of 1,261 subjects (?60 years; 63% women) of EpiFloripa Aging Study (2017-2019). Depressive symptoms e MCI were screened by the Geriatric Depression Scale and Mini Mental State Examination, respectively. Weekly frequency of moderate-to-vigorous PA, diet and time spent on SB, were assessed by questionnaires. Two-step cluster analysis was used to identify patterns of behavior, and binary logistic regression was used to test the association between variables. Four clusters were identified: inactive/poor diet; inactive/healthy diet; sedentary/healthy diet and more active/healthy diet. Older adults with a “more active/healthy diet” profile were less likely to have mild cognitive impairment (OR: 0.48; IC95%: 0.24-0.97) and depressive symptoms (OR: 0.36; IC95%: 0.16-0.78) compared to the “inactive/poor diet” cluster. The analytical and conceptual cluster model suggested a beneficial association between the "more active/healthy diet" profile and mental health.Palavras-chave:
Mental health; Aged; Healthy lifestyleAbstract:
Este estudo descreveu agrupamentos de atividade física (AF), qualidade da dieta e comportamento sedentário (CS), e analisou as associações entre os agrupamentos e sintomas depressivos e comprometimento cognitivo (CCL) em idosos brasileiros. A amostra foi composta de 1261 participantes (≥60 anos; 63mulheres) do estudo EpiFloripa Idoso. Sintomas depressivos e CCL foram rastreados pela Escala de Depressão Geriátrica e Mini Exame do Estado Mental, respectivamente. A frequência semanal de atividade física moderada-a-vigorosa, qualidade da dieta e tempo despendido em CS foram mensurados por questionários. Análise de agrupamento em duas etapas foi usada para identificar os padrões do estilo de vida, e a regressão logística binária foi usada para testar as associações entre as variáveis. Quatro agrupamentos foram identificados: inativo/dieta pobre; inativo/dieta saudável; sedentário/dieta saudável e mais ativo/dieta saudável. Idosos com perfil “mais ativo/dieta saudável” tiveram menos chance de CCL (OR: 0,48; IC95%: 0,24-0,97) e sintomas depressivos (OR: 0,36; IC95%: 0,16-0,78) quando comparados ao agrupamento “inativo/dieta pobre”. O modelo de agrupamento analítico e conceitual sugeriu associação benéfica entre o perfil “mais ativo/dieta saudável” e saúde mental.Keywords:
Saúde mental; Idoso; Estilo de vida saudávelConteúdo:
BACKGROUND
The world's population is aging rapidly, and with it the concern for the mental health of older people is growing1. It is estimated that depressive symptoms affect around 28.4% of the older population worldwide2, while the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) ranges from 5% to 41%3. Evidence indicates that adopting healthy behaviors, including regular physical activity (PA), consuming a healthy diet and reducing time sedentary behavior (SB), contributes to reducing the risks of depressive symptoms4,5 and MCI in older adults6,7.
While the underlying mechanisms of these mental conditions are not fully understood, studies show that engaging in physical activity alone improves cognitive outcomes by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6, commonly known in neurodegenerative diseases8. PA triggers an increase in levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and contributes to the release of hormones associated with well-being, such as noradrenaline and serotonin9. This process promotes improvement in depression symptoms9. Additionally, physical activity can boost self-esteem and self-confidence among older adults9
The literature also observes gains in memory and attention with the intake of nutritious foods10. Consuming fish11, flavonols, and monomeric teaflavins, mainly from teas12, as well as having a higher dietary quality, is related to a lower likelihood of depressive symptoms in older adults13. There's potential synergy between consuming antioxidant-rich foods and engaging in physical activity for cognitive health14.
On the other hand, sedentary behavior (SB) is associated with elevated inflammatory status indicated by biomarkers such as C-reactive protein15,16 and interleukin-616, as well as white matter hyperintensity17. These factors are considered causal influencers of depressive symptoms18 and MCI19. However, older adults who spend less than four hours per day in sedentary behavior show less cognitive impairment20.
It's important to consider that PA, dietary habits and SB don't occur in isolation in the lives of older adults but may depend on a lifestyle that interrelates favorable and unfavorable behaviors. Generally, behavioral patterns characterized by higher levels of PA and less time spent in SB are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome21,22 and a body composition more conducive to health23. Furthermore, older adults who habitually consume fruits and vegetables most days of the week and engage in regular PA are more likely to report life satisfaction24. Specifically, regarding mental health, greater involvement in PA compared to SB has shown significant benefits in cognitive function25,26. However, there's no evidence of synergy between PA and a healthy diet in cognitive function27. In terms of depressive symptoms, the unfavorable combination of not meeting PA guidelines and spending excessive time in SB increased the chances of adverse outcomes in older adults4.
Studies investigating the synergy between PA, diet and SB in the mental health of older adults have been limited to analyzing only two of these components, either the relationship between PA and diet27 or between PA and SB4. However, considering that PA, SB, and dietary habits are behaviors shaped over a lifetime and susceptible to modifications28, exploring these aspects collectively may provide valuable insights for mental health care29.
The development of interventions considering multiple health behaviors requires a thorough understanding of how these behaviors cluster in different individual profiles. In this regard, cluster analysis is considered a multivariate data method recommended for its ability to group individuals into mutually exclusive sets, considering similar characteristics and behaviors30. Previous studies with older adults have also employed cluster analysis as a clustering method22,23. However, it is still not clear how lifestyle behaviors naturally cluster and whether they influence the risk of MCI and depressive symptoms in older adults.
Therefore, considering the potential of cluster analyses and the possibility of providing an integrated understanding of elderly care, the present study aimed to describe clusters of PA, dietary quality and SB, and examine the associations between these clusters and depressive symptoms and MCI in Brazilian older adults.
METHODS
This is a cross-sectional study conducted by face-to-face interviews at the older adult’s home, using data from the third wave (2017-2019) of the population-based cohort study entitled “EpiFloripa Aging Study – Health Conditions of Older Adults in Florianópolis, SC - https://epifloripaidoso.paginas.ufsc.br/#”. The sample consisted of older adults (? 60 years old) of both sexes, living in the urban area of the city, capital of Santa Catarina state, southern Brazil. The city has a high Human Development Index (HDI) compared to the national average (0.847 versus 0.755), with the longevity dimension being the one that most contributed to the HDI, followed by income and education, with indices of 0.873, 0.870 and 0.800, respectively31. The study was approved by the Federal University of Santa Catarina’s Research Ethics Committee involving human beings (approval no 16731313.0.0000.0121)
Sampling and selection of participants
The sampling plan of the third wave carried out in 2017/2019 (1,335 older adults) was based on the sampling technique used in the first wave of the study, in 2009/2010 (1,702 older adults), then in 2013/2014 follow-up (1,197 older adults)32, as well as on demographic census data to guarantee the representativeness of the older adults residing in the urban area of the city. With the third wave, the cohort became open and included new older adults belonging to the census sectors of the first wave, and those who participated in the Epifloripa Adult [EpiFloripa Adulto] study (2009-2010), and who turned 60 years of age as of July 201833. Were included older adults (?60 years) and were excluded institutionalized.
Outcomes
Presence of depressive symptoms was obtained by applying the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), validated and adequate for the Brazilian older adults34.The original English version35 was translated into Portuguese and then back-translated into English by an independent translator. The English back-translation was compared to the original instrument, and minor adjustments were made to produce the final Brazilian version of the scale34. This instrument is composed of 15 questions and with answer options (yes/no). The instrument has a score that varies from zero (absence of depressive symptoms) to fifteen (maximum score of depressive symptoms). The cutoff point ?6 points was considered indicative of the presence of depressive symptoms in older adults 34.
Mild cognitive impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), which is considered a cognitive assessment test that covers the domains of temporal and spatial orientation, recent and recall memory, calculation, comprehension and writing 36. The MMSE score can range from 0 to 30 points, and the presence of cognitive decline was considered when the older adults without schooling achieved scores <19, while <24 points were considered among those with some educational level 37. The MMSE presented a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 70.9% for the diagnosis of dementia among older adults without schooling; and 77.8% and 75.4% of sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for those with school history 37.
Exposure
The behavioral cluster, considered as the exposure variable, was built taking the following variables into account: 1) the weekly frequency of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during leisure time, measured with the long version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), adapted and validated for Brazil’s older population (36 women and 29 men)38,39; 2) sedentary behavior (min/day), operationally obtained by self-reporting of average screen time (watching television or using the computer), performed in the sitting, lying or reclining position40. The instrument used to measure sedentary behavior (Measure of Older Sedentary Time) demonstrated consistent test-retest reliability, making it suitable for use with older adults40. The cross-culturally adapted for Brazilian older adults also showed appropriate psychometric properties for assessing sedentary behavior41; and 3) food consumption (weekly frequency)42, obtained by self-reporting of the frequency of days of the week (0-7 days) in which the following foods are consumed: 3.1) vegetables (raw or cooked with food or in soup, except for potatoes, cassava or yam); 3.2) fruits (fresh); 3.3) beans; 3.4) whole grains (containing ingredients such as oatmeal, flaxseed, quinoa, granola, brown rice, whole wheat pasta, etc.); 3.5) fried foods (foods with a lot of fat in their preparation); 3.6) sugary drinks (soda and artificial juice), and 3.7) sweets (ice cream, cake, chocolates, cookies and pastries). The first four food groups were considered unprocessed/minimally processed, and the other items, as ultra-processed. A score was created based on the frequency of consumption of the seven types of food to identify the nutritional diet quality. For the group of unprocessed/minimally processed foods, the scale ranged from 0 (no consumption) to 7 (every day); and for the ultra-processed group, the scale ranged from 7 (no consumption) to 0 (every day). Thus, the total score can range from 0 to 49 points, being that the higher the score the better the nutritional quality of the diet 44
Control variables
We selected covariates identified in the literature as relevant to the relationship between outcomes and exposure45–51: sex (male and female), age (completed in years), education (completed years) and living alone (yes/no) variables were included. Self-reported presence of diabetes and history of stroke were identified by the question “Has any doctor or health professional ever said that you currently have/have had?”, with yes/no as answer options. Functional dependence was assessed using the Brazilian Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire, adapted from the Old Americans Resources and Services, validated for Brazil52 . The variable was categorized into no functional dependence (absence of dependence), mild dependence (dependence in one to three activities) and moderate/severe (dependence in four or more activities) within a set of 15 activities52.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive analyses were performed, including mean and standard deviation, relative and absolute frequencies, and 95% confidence intervals. Two-step cluster analysis30 was used to form a cluster based on three variables: 1) MVPA (frequency/week); 2) sedentary behavior (min/week), and 3) diet (consumption/no consumption of unprocessed, minimally processed and ultra-processed foods). The number of clusters was based on the best combination of low Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the high proportion of distance measures, and the high proportion of BIC changes, as well as significant conceptual considerations. Cluster quality in the total dataset was analyzed by silhouette coefficient indicating cohesion and separation (silhouette ranging from -1 to +1; a high value indicates that the object matches well with its own cluster and poorly with neighboring clusters). The relative importance of each variable in the model was also observed. The importance of the predictor ranges from 0 to 1 (values close to 1 mean relatively greater importance). All three variables reached values equal to 1. Four clusters were identified in the sample of this study and labeled in accordance with the most pronounced behavioral profile.
Crude and adjusted logistic regression by covariates considered relevant in the literature45–51 and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI95%) were used to test the association between the outcomes (depressive symptoms and mild cognitive impairment) and the identified clusters (exposure). The significance level was set as p < 0.05 in all inferential statistics, considering the sample weights. Statistical analyses were performed using the Stata Statistical software (version 13; StatCorp LLC, College Station, TX), except for cluster analysis, which was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software for Windows (version 23; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Results
A total of 1,335 older adults (between 60 and 108 years old) participated in the study. Of these, 53 interviews were considered losses because they were answered by caregivers, and 21, were due to incomplete data, an important condition for Two-Step cluster analysis. Thus, the final sample consisted of 1,261 older adults (age: 73.1±7.7, 63.1% women). In general, the older adults had 9.0 ± 6.1 years of schooling; 22.2% lived alone (CI95%: 19.6- 24.1); performed MVPA less than one day/week (0.3±0.8); spent >3 hours/day on sedentary behavior (220.6 ±154.4); consumed vegetables (5.4 ± 2.2), fruits (6.3 ± 1.6), and beans (4.2 ± 2.5) most days of the week, and the average diet quality score was 26.5 (±12.5). Among the older adults, 26% reported having diabetes (CI95%: 23.3 -28.1), 8% had a history of stroke (CI95%: 7.6-10.8), and 38% had mild functional dependency (CI95%: 34.7-40.1). Presence of depressive symptoms and mild cognitive impairment stood at 14.7% (CI95%: 11.9-17.8) and 17.3% (CI95%: 14.1-21.1), respectively (Table 1).
<< TABLE 1>>
Cluster profile description
Four behavioral clusters were identified in the sample of older adults and defined as “inactive/poor diet” (Cluster 1), “inactive/healthy diet” (Cluster 2), “sedentary/healthy diet” (Cluster 3), “more active/healthy diet” (Cluster 4), as shown in Figure 1. The “inactive/poor diet” profile (Cluster 1) profile represented a quarter of the sample (25.4%; CI95%: 22.3-28.9) and was characterized by engagement in MVPA less than once/week; daily expenditure on sedentary behavior of approximately two hours, and worse diet quality score. The “inactive/healthy diet” profile (Cluster 2) has the highest percentage of older adults (39.5%; CI95%:35.9-43.2), the lowest average weekly frequency of MVPA; high sedentary behavior (>3 hours/day), and better diet quality. The third cluster, “sedentary/healthy diet”, comprised 17.2% and included a weekly MVPA frequency of less than one day/week; more time spent on sedentary behavior (>8 hours/day), and a score of 25.3 points for diet quality. The “more active/healthy diet” profile (Cluster 4) accounted for 17.9 (CI95%: 15.4-20.6) of the sample and had the highest average weekly frequency of MVPA (1.7 days/week), daily expenditure of more than three hours/day on sedentary behavior, in addition to scoring 29.9 points on diet quality, which is above the group median (Table 2).
<
The world's population is aging rapidly, and with it the concern for the mental health of older people is growing1. It is estimated that depressive symptoms affect around 28.4% of the older population worldwide2, while the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) ranges from 5% to 41%3. Evidence indicates that adopting healthy behaviors, including regular physical activity (PA), consuming a healthy diet and reducing time sedentary behavior (SB), contributes to reducing the risks of depressive symptoms4,5 and MCI in older adults6,7.
While the underlying mechanisms of these mental conditions are not fully understood, studies show that engaging in physical activity alone improves cognitive outcomes by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6, commonly known in neurodegenerative diseases8. PA triggers an increase in levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and contributes to the release of hormones associated with well-being, such as noradrenaline and serotonin9. This process promotes improvement in depression symptoms9. Additionally, physical activity can boost self-esteem and self-confidence among older adults9
The literature also observes gains in memory and attention with the intake of nutritious foods10. Consuming fish11, flavonols, and monomeric teaflavins, mainly from teas12, as well as having a higher dietary quality, is related to a lower likelihood of depressive symptoms in older adults13. There's potential synergy between consuming antioxidant-rich foods and engaging in physical activity for cognitive health14.
On the other hand, sedentary behavior (SB) is associated with elevated inflammatory status indicated by biomarkers such as C-reactive protein15,16 and interleukin-616, as well as white matter hyperintensity17. These factors are considered causal influencers of depressive symptoms18 and MCI19. However, older adults who spend less than four hours per day in sedentary behavior show less cognitive impairment20.
It's important to consider that PA, dietary habits and SB don't occur in isolation in the lives of older adults but may depend on a lifestyle that interrelates favorable and unfavorable behaviors. Generally, behavioral patterns characterized by higher levels of PA and less time spent in SB are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome21,22 and a body composition more conducive to health23. Furthermore, older adults who habitually consume fruits and vegetables most days of the week and engage in regular PA are more likely to report life satisfaction24. Specifically, regarding mental health, greater involvement in PA compared to SB has shown significant benefits in cognitive function25,26. However, there's no evidence of synergy between PA and a healthy diet in cognitive function27. In terms of depressive symptoms, the unfavorable combination of not meeting PA guidelines and spending excessive time in SB increased the chances of adverse outcomes in older adults4.
Studies investigating the synergy between PA, diet and SB in the mental health of older adults have been limited to analyzing only two of these components, either the relationship between PA and diet27 or between PA and SB4. However, considering that PA, SB, and dietary habits are behaviors shaped over a lifetime and susceptible to modifications28, exploring these aspects collectively may provide valuable insights for mental health care29.
The development of interventions considering multiple health behaviors requires a thorough understanding of how these behaviors cluster in different individual profiles. In this regard, cluster analysis is considered a multivariate data method recommended for its ability to group individuals into mutually exclusive sets, considering similar characteristics and behaviors30. Previous studies with older adults have also employed cluster analysis as a clustering method22,23. However, it is still not clear how lifestyle behaviors naturally cluster and whether they influence the risk of MCI and depressive symptoms in older adults.
Therefore, considering the potential of cluster analyses and the possibility of providing an integrated understanding of elderly care, the present study aimed to describe clusters of PA, dietary quality and SB, and examine the associations between these clusters and depressive symptoms and MCI in Brazilian older adults.
METHODS
This is a cross-sectional study conducted by face-to-face interviews at the older adult’s home, using data from the third wave (2017-2019) of the population-based cohort study entitled “EpiFloripa Aging Study – Health Conditions of Older Adults in Florianópolis, SC - https://epifloripaidoso.paginas.ufsc.br/#”. The sample consisted of older adults (? 60 years old) of both sexes, living in the urban area of the city, capital of Santa Catarina state, southern Brazil. The city has a high Human Development Index (HDI) compared to the national average (0.847 versus 0.755), with the longevity dimension being the one that most contributed to the HDI, followed by income and education, with indices of 0.873, 0.870 and 0.800, respectively31. The study was approved by the Federal University of Santa Catarina’s Research Ethics Committee involving human beings (approval no 16731313.0.0000.0121)
Sampling and selection of participants
The sampling plan of the third wave carried out in 2017/2019 (1,335 older adults) was based on the sampling technique used in the first wave of the study, in 2009/2010 (1,702 older adults), then in 2013/2014 follow-up (1,197 older adults)32, as well as on demographic census data to guarantee the representativeness of the older adults residing in the urban area of the city. With the third wave, the cohort became open and included new older adults belonging to the census sectors of the first wave, and those who participated in the Epifloripa Adult [EpiFloripa Adulto] study (2009-2010), and who turned 60 years of age as of July 201833. Were included older adults (?60 years) and were excluded institutionalized.
Outcomes
Presence of depressive symptoms was obtained by applying the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), validated and adequate for the Brazilian older adults34.The original English version35 was translated into Portuguese and then back-translated into English by an independent translator. The English back-translation was compared to the original instrument, and minor adjustments were made to produce the final Brazilian version of the scale34. This instrument is composed of 15 questions and with answer options (yes/no). The instrument has a score that varies from zero (absence of depressive symptoms) to fifteen (maximum score of depressive symptoms). The cutoff point ?6 points was considered indicative of the presence of depressive symptoms in older adults 34.
Mild cognitive impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), which is considered a cognitive assessment test that covers the domains of temporal and spatial orientation, recent and recall memory, calculation, comprehension and writing 36. The MMSE score can range from 0 to 30 points, and the presence of cognitive decline was considered when the older adults without schooling achieved scores <19, while <24 points were considered among those with some educational level 37. The MMSE presented a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 70.9% for the diagnosis of dementia among older adults without schooling; and 77.8% and 75.4% of sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for those with school history 37.
Exposure
The behavioral cluster, considered as the exposure variable, was built taking the following variables into account: 1) the weekly frequency of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) during leisure time, measured with the long version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), adapted and validated for Brazil’s older population (36 women and 29 men)38,39; 2) sedentary behavior (min/day), operationally obtained by self-reporting of average screen time (watching television or using the computer), performed in the sitting, lying or reclining position40. The instrument used to measure sedentary behavior (Measure of Older Sedentary Time) demonstrated consistent test-retest reliability, making it suitable for use with older adults40. The cross-culturally adapted for Brazilian older adults also showed appropriate psychometric properties for assessing sedentary behavior41; and 3) food consumption (weekly frequency)42, obtained by self-reporting of the frequency of days of the week (0-7 days) in which the following foods are consumed: 3.1) vegetables (raw or cooked with food or in soup, except for potatoes, cassava or yam); 3.2) fruits (fresh); 3.3) beans; 3.4) whole grains (containing ingredients such as oatmeal, flaxseed, quinoa, granola, brown rice, whole wheat pasta, etc.); 3.5) fried foods (foods with a lot of fat in their preparation); 3.6) sugary drinks (soda and artificial juice), and 3.7) sweets (ice cream, cake, chocolates, cookies and pastries). The first four food groups were considered unprocessed/minimally processed, and the other items, as ultra-processed. A score was created based on the frequency of consumption of the seven types of food to identify the nutritional diet quality. For the group of unprocessed/minimally processed foods, the scale ranged from 0 (no consumption) to 7 (every day); and for the ultra-processed group, the scale ranged from 7 (no consumption) to 0 (every day). Thus, the total score can range from 0 to 49 points, being that the higher the score the better the nutritional quality of the diet 44
Control variables
We selected covariates identified in the literature as relevant to the relationship between outcomes and exposure45–51: sex (male and female), age (completed in years), education (completed years) and living alone (yes/no) variables were included. Self-reported presence of diabetes and history of stroke were identified by the question “Has any doctor or health professional ever said that you currently have/have had?”, with yes/no as answer options. Functional dependence was assessed using the Brazilian Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire, adapted from the Old Americans Resources and Services, validated for Brazil52 . The variable was categorized into no functional dependence (absence of dependence), mild dependence (dependence in one to three activities) and moderate/severe (dependence in four or more activities) within a set of 15 activities52.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive analyses were performed, including mean and standard deviation, relative and absolute frequencies, and 95% confidence intervals. Two-step cluster analysis30 was used to form a cluster based on three variables: 1) MVPA (frequency/week); 2) sedentary behavior (min/week), and 3) diet (consumption/no consumption of unprocessed, minimally processed and ultra-processed foods). The number of clusters was based on the best combination of low Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the high proportion of distance measures, and the high proportion of BIC changes, as well as significant conceptual considerations. Cluster quality in the total dataset was analyzed by silhouette coefficient indicating cohesion and separation (silhouette ranging from -1 to +1; a high value indicates that the object matches well with its own cluster and poorly with neighboring clusters). The relative importance of each variable in the model was also observed. The importance of the predictor ranges from 0 to 1 (values close to 1 mean relatively greater importance). All three variables reached values equal to 1. Four clusters were identified in the sample of this study and labeled in accordance with the most pronounced behavioral profile.
Crude and adjusted logistic regression by covariates considered relevant in the literature45–51 and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI95%) were used to test the association between the outcomes (depressive symptoms and mild cognitive impairment) and the identified clusters (exposure). The significance level was set as p < 0.05 in all inferential statistics, considering the sample weights. Statistical analyses were performed using the Stata Statistical software (version 13; StatCorp LLC, College Station, TX), except for cluster analysis, which was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software for Windows (version 23; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Results
A total of 1,335 older adults (between 60 and 108 years old) participated in the study. Of these, 53 interviews were considered losses because they were answered by caregivers, and 21, were due to incomplete data, an important condition for Two-Step cluster analysis. Thus, the final sample consisted of 1,261 older adults (age: 73.1±7.7, 63.1% women). In general, the older adults had 9.0 ± 6.1 years of schooling; 22.2% lived alone (CI95%: 19.6- 24.1); performed MVPA less than one day/week (0.3±0.8); spent >3 hours/day on sedentary behavior (220.6 ±154.4); consumed vegetables (5.4 ± 2.2), fruits (6.3 ± 1.6), and beans (4.2 ± 2.5) most days of the week, and the average diet quality score was 26.5 (±12.5). Among the older adults, 26% reported having diabetes (CI95%: 23.3 -28.1), 8% had a history of stroke (CI95%: 7.6-10.8), and 38% had mild functional dependency (CI95%: 34.7-40.1). Presence of depressive symptoms and mild cognitive impairment stood at 14.7% (CI95%: 11.9-17.8) and 17.3% (CI95%: 14.1-21.1), respectively (Table 1).
<< TABLE 1>>
Cluster profile description
Four behavioral clusters were identified in the sample of older adults and defined as “inactive/poor diet” (Cluster 1), “inactive/healthy diet” (Cluster 2), “sedentary/healthy diet” (Cluster 3), “more active/healthy diet” (Cluster 4), as shown in Figure 1. The “inactive/poor diet” profile (Cluster 1) profile represented a quarter of the sample (25.4%; CI95%: 22.3-28.9) and was characterized by engagement in MVPA less than once/week; daily expenditure on sedentary behavior of approximately two hours, and worse diet quality score. The “inactive/healthy diet” profile (Cluster 2) has the highest percentage of older adults (39.5%; CI95%:35.9-43.2), the lowest average weekly frequency of MVPA; high sedentary behavior (>3 hours/day), and better diet quality. The third cluster, “sedentary/healthy diet”, comprised 17.2% and included a weekly MVPA frequency of less than one day/week; more time spent on sedentary behavior (>8 hours/day), and a score of 25.3 points for diet quality. The “more active/healthy diet” profile (Cluster 4) accounted for 17.9 (CI95%: 15.4-20.6) of the sample and had the highest average weekly frequency of MVPA (1.7 days/week), daily expenditure of more than three hours/day on sedentary behavior, in addition to scoring 29.9 points on diet quality, which is above the group median (Table 2).
<
>
<>>
<