Artigos

Conteúdo (article):

Evidence of the validity of the Food and Nutritional Security Scale for adolescents (ESANa)

Marjorie Rafaela Lima do Vale, Universidade de Alberta, E-mail: marjorievale@ualberta.ca, orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-5710
Walberto Silva dos Santos, Universidade Federal do Ceará, E-mail: walbertosantos@ufc.br, orcid.org/0000-0001-6816-0105
José Airton de Freitas Pontes Junior, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, E-mail: jose.airton@uece.br, orcid.org/ 0000-0003-2045-2461
Renata Belizário Diniz, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, E-mail: rbelizariodiniz@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3757-6789
Maria Marlene Marques Ávila, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, E-mail: marlene.avila@uece.br, orcid.org/0000-0002-8511-2524.

RESUMO
O objetivo do trabalho foi desenvolver uma escala válida e fidedigna para a avaliação de insegurança alimentar e nutricional especificamente em adolescentes. A versão inicial da escala foi composta por duas subescalas: percepção de insegurança alimentar e percepção de segurança nutricional. Os itens elaborados foram submetidos à análise de conteúdo por peritos em segurança alimentar e nutricional (n=4) e à análise semântica por adolescentes selecionados por conveniência e oriundos da população alvo (n=20). Após ajustes, a versão final da escala foi aplicada junto a adolescentes escolares (n = 425) com idade entre 12 e 18 anos (m = 14,32±0,96; CV = 6,7%). Após realização de análise fatorial exploratória, um modelo de dois fatores foi o que se mostrou mais adequado. As subescalas avaliadas apresentaram valores modestos do coeficiente alfa (0,69 e 0,60, respectivamente). Consumo diário de frutas, verduras e refrigerantes se mostrou significativamente associado a escores mais elevados na escala de percepção de segurança alimentar e nutricional. Sugere-se a viabilidade de combinar itens com base no acesso a alimentos com outros relacionados a atitudes e práticas de alimentação saudável de modo a obter um retrato mais aproximado das necessidades dos adolescentes e melhor orientar políticas públicas.
Palavras-chave: Estudos de validação. Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Adolescente.
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale for assessing food and nutritional insecurity, specifically in adolescents. The initial version of the scale consisted of two subscales: perception of food insecurity and perception of nutritional security. The items were submitted to content analysis (n=4) by a group of food and nutrition security experts, and semantic analysis (n=20) by a group of adolescents conveniently sampled from the target population. After adjustments, the final version of the scale was applied to adolescent students (n=425) aged 12 to 18 years (m=14.32±0.96; CV=6.7%). A two-factor model was the most appropriate after performing exploratory factor analysis. The subscales showed modest values of the alpha coefficient (0.69 and 0.60, respectively). Daily consumption of fruits, vegetables and soft drinks was significantly associated with higher scores in the food and nutrition security perception scale. Therefore, it is recommended to combine food access-based items with other aspects related to attitudes and behaviors towards healthy eating in order to achieve a more accurate picture of adolescent’s needs and better guide public policies.
Keywords: Validation studies. Food and nutritional security. Adolescent.


INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
Adolescence is a period of progressive biological, cognitive, social and emotional development1. In developing countries such as Brazil, it is not uncommon for adolescents to be vulnerable to Food and Nutritional Insecurity (InSAN)2. Being in InSAN means not having physical or financial access to quality food regularly or lacking the capacity to choose and consume healthy foods that ensure the exercise of an active and healthy life3. Thus, planning interventions to promote food and nutritional security among adolescents is essential, since being in InSAN has been associated with deleterious short- and long-term effects, including symptoms of discomfort, distress and sadness4, lower psychosocial functioning5, weight gain and consequent comorbidities6.
Currently, several methods facilitate InSAN7 estimated level. The most commonly used tool for tracking InSAN at the household level is based on a head of household-reported food and nutritional insecurity perception scale. Recently, given the arguments that individuals within the same household can experience different levels of food insecurity8, the adaptation and validation of this scale for individual use has been proposed.
National and international references of studies of validation and application of this type of scale specifically with adolescents9 are currently available. Despite favorable arguments for the validity of this scale among the adolescent population, one of the criticisms related to its use includes the fact that the use of commonly applied items among adults would result in concerns regarding the validity of the instrument and its findings, since experiences of InSAN lived by adolescents are unique in terms of content and context10. Besides, there are also criticisms related to the fact that the content of the presented items retrieves a subjective component related to the experience of hunger, unemployment, risks of unmet needs and lack of access to food on a daily basis11. This conception is, to a certain extent, contrary to the understanding that food and nutritional security results not only from food availability and supply but also the consumption of these foods, to ensure adequate nutritional status12 and necessary for an active and healthy life.
Thus, the development of perceptual scales focused on identifying not only financial accessibility to healthy foods but also the identification of attitudes and feeding practices is fundamental to guide better the use of resources used in public policies to make them more effective. Because of such arguments, this study aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale for assessing food and nutritional insecurity, specifically in adolescents.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This is a methodological study13 for the elaboration and proposal of a food and nutritional security assessment scale for adolescents (ESANa).
Sampling
The following parameters were used to calculate the sample size: the total number of adolescent ninth-graders enrolled in the urban area of Fortaleza in 2012 (32,977 students), 95% confidence interval, a maximum tolerable error of 5%, and estimated food insecurity prevalence (21.3%)14. As the sampling unit selection process was by conglomerates, the size initially calculated was multiplied by two (sample design effect – DEFF). Considering the estimated sample size and the number of students per school, nine elementary schools (5 public – 4 private) were selected with probability proportional to size.
The cluster sampling process was used for practical feasibility reasons (time and cost). The procedure was carried out in two stages: (a) choice of schools; (b) random selection of classes within schools. All students from each selected class were invited to participate in the study. Also, since it is a validation of an instrument, the recommendation of ten or more participants by the number of items was met15.
Data collection
Data were collected from May to August 2014. The ESANa was administered collectively in classrooms with the presence of a researcher for any clarification required. The students were also given a form of socioeconomic and food habits classification with adaptations16. Students who showed agreement had their weight and height measured.
Concerning weight measurement, adolescents were informed about the need to take any material from the pockets of their school uniform, as well as to take off socks and shoes. A G-TECH scale with a 150 kg capacity and 100-gram precision was used. Height was measured with the teenager standing erect, arms outstretched along the body, head held high and staring at a fixed point at eye level, barefoot and head prop-free17. The instrument used was a Sanny Personal Caprice stadiometer. The BMI value was obtained by calculating the weight in kilograms divided by the squared height and classified as per the criteria of the World Health Organization18.
Instrument development
The construction of the ESANa was guided by an individual perception of food and nutritional insecurity. Concerning the construction of items, a review of the literature on the subject was carried out and items of existing instruments considered19-21. The initial version of the scale consisted of two subscales, containing nine and six items (Table 1) related to food insecurity and nutritional security. The difference between the food and nutritional domains was based on the design proposed by the Brazilian Action for Nutrition and Human Rights (ABRANDH), in which the food domain builds on the sufficient and stable production and access to food, and the nutritional domain incorporates elements related to the choice and consumption of healthy foods22.
Content analysis
The content adequacy check was carried out by a group of four food and nutritional security experts. Participants’ expertise was evaluated using a modified version of the criteria proposed by Fehring (1987)23, which included the accomplishment of works, academic projects and publications on food and nutritional security, totaling fourteen points. The experts were all female, with an area of activity in different Brazilian geographic locations (North and Northeast) and abroad (Canada), and obtained an average score of 8 ± 2.34 points. The experts were selected using the snowball technique24. Aspects related to clarity, practical relevance and theoretical relevance were evaluated using a Likert scale of 1 to 5 points. The data obtained were used to estimate the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC)25.
Semantic analysis
The understanding of the proposed items and instructions was evaluated by four groups of adolescents from public and private schools. We aimed to keep homogeneous groups to avoid controversy and constraints26. The groups consisted of five to six adolescents selected by convenience. Adolescents were asked to give their opinion about the comprehension of the response format and content of the items (e.g., “In your own words, what is being asked here? Is there something you find confusing or difficult to understand?”). Adjustments and corrections were made at the end of each group. New groups were conducted until no further suggestions were made by adolescents. In the end, a total of three groups were conducted with students from public schools and one group with students from private schools.
Psychometric analysis
The adequacy of the data matrix to perform the factorial analysis was evaluated using two markers KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin)27 and Bartlett’s sphericity test (BST)28. The number of factors extracted was guided by the criteria of Kaiser (Eigenvalues)25 and Cattell (Scree plot)29.
An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed after selecting the number of factors to be extracted. Concerning the selection of items, a factor loading > 0.3030 was considered. Furthermore, the corrected total item correlation with the respective factor and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were verified.
Finally, the scores were classified as low, medium and high, using cut-off points based on the 25, 50 and 75 percentiles, and the classification obtained was correlated with socioeconomic variables, nutritional status and food consumption by Kendall tau and Mann-Whitney tests. The level of significance was set at 0.05. All analyses were performed using different packages of the R software, 1.0.136 – © 2009-2016 RStudio, Inc.
This research was approved by the Research Ethics Council of the State University of Ceará, under opinion 147.467, as per the precepts of Resolution 196/96 of the CNS/MS31.
RESULTS
The final sample consisted of 425 adolescents, mostly female (53.9%), with ages ranging from 12 to 18 years (m=14.32 ± 0.96, CV = 6.7%). The sociodemographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Content analysis
Table 2 shows the content validity coefficient values. All the items evaluated were adequate regarding issues of practical pertinence and theoretical relevance, meaning that the items were adequate to measure the construct evaluated in the population in question. Items 6 “I eat a lot in a meal as there might be no more the next day” and 8 “I skip meals” were considered unclear. We chose to reformulate the items after the semantic analysis stage with the adolescents.
Table 2
Semantic analysis
In the semantic evaluation stage with adolescents, terms such as “healthy meals” were described as “fruits/vegetables/greens/a balanced meal”, showing that adolescents had a good understanding of the term employed32. Among the suggested reformulations, item 4 was reformulated to read “The lack of food in my house causes me concern”, item 6 new sentence read “I eat a lot in a meal because there may be no more after”, item 12 was split into two “I look at the expiration date of the food before eating” and “I read the nutritional information that is on the food label”, as well as item 13, which was split into “I care if the foods I eat are healthy” and “I care if the foods I eat are contaminant / dirt-free”.
Psychometric analysis
The final version of the scale with fifteen items was then applied and the results described below. Because of the non-functioning of some response categories presented (categories with less than 5% of the observed responses), and in order to obtain a more parsimonious solution, the original response format of 7 points (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=half of the time, 5=most of the time, 6=often and 7=always) was reorganized into a 4-point solution, where adjacent categories 4=half of the time, 5=most of the time, 6=often and 7=always collapsed into a single category, 4=often or always.
Exploratory Factor Analysis
The values observed in Bartlett’s sphericity test [χ2 2 (14) = 799.42 (p <0.001)] and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) (0.72) confirmed the adequacy of the matrix for conducting factor analyses25. The Kaiser criterion identified the existence of three factors with eigenvalues higher than 1.027. The scree plot29 highlighted the existence of two factors. Considering the modest increment observed in the variance explained by the solution of three factors and the greater theoretical coherence of the simpler model, the two-factor solution was chosen and used in the subsequent analyses.
The exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation was then performed, fixing the extraction of two factors (Table 3). The varimax rotation was chosen considering the low correlation between the factors (r=-0.09). The factor loadings observed indicated that the first factor grouped nine nutritional safety-related items. Item 9 “I skip meals” was removed because it had a factor loading <0.30, and an increase of 0.01 in the alpha coefficient if it was deleted. Its removal resulted in a range of factor loadings of |31| and |82|. Reliability for this scale was estimated at 0.69. The second factor grouped six food insecurity-related items. The initial factor loadings for this factor ranged from |0.50| to |0.73|. Cronbach’s alpha for this factor was estimated at 0.60, and 0.62 for the full scale.
Table 3
Table 4 summarizes the cut-off points used and the distribution of adolescents interviewed. Cut-off points were delimited using the 25, 50 and 75 percentiles. For example, a total of 5 points on the food insecurity scale were classified as low risk, since this value is below the 25th percentile, showing that only 25 for every 100 adolescents in this population will have scored below 5 points.
Table 4
As can be seen in Table 5, while about 30% of adolescents had low scores in the nutritional security scale, only 19% had a high food insecurity risk. Also, adolescents with low scores on the nutritional security scale reported significantly consuming fewer vegetables and fruits and more soft drinks daily compared to those who scored higher. While not statistically significant, low scores on the nutritional security scale were also observed among overweight adolescents from public schools and whose heads of household had lower schooling. On the other hand, adolescents at high risk of food insecurity had lower, albeit not significant prevalence of overweight.
Table 5

DISCUSSION
The estimated food insecurity in individuals under 18 years of age is recurrently obtained indirectly through the perception of a respondent responsible for the household. However, the use of this approach hinders a positive association of food insecurity (evaluated at the household level) identified with consequences related to food consumption and nutritional status (individual level)33.
Thus, studies aimed at measuring food insecurity through self-reporting by adolescents have been conducted and obtained satisfactory results concerning construct validity and reliability6,33 also in Brazil9. However, the validated instruments have a limited perspective of the concept of food security, focusing only on financial access to food, neglecting the nutritional component, reinforcing the unique nature of this study.
Regarding the psychometric characteristics of the presented scale, the high values of the content validity coefficient attributed by the experts indicated that the items were conceptually related to the phenomenon of food and nutritional insecurity. Empirically, the proposed conceptual structure was confirmed, considering that most of the evaluated items evidenced clear saturations in only one factor and satisfactory corrected item-total correlation values. Only items “I spend the whole day without eating” and “I skip meals” were grouped in factors other than initially planned. This may be justified because food restriction behaviors are relatively common among adolescents for reasons other than physical or financial access to food, justifying the relevance of redesigned food and nutrition security measures for this context.
For example, in a population survey conducted in 2003 with a representative sample of households from different socioeconomic levels of the city of Campinas, Panigassi et al. (2008)34 found that even in food secure households – that is, with guaranteed access to food – food consumption was qualitatively inadequate, where about 26.3% of respondents did not eat even a single fruit daily. There was also an inverse relationship between sweets and soft drinks consumption and food insecurity, with lower consumption among households with higher food insecurity. Among adolescents, a study of 573 schoolchildren from Rio Grande do Sul showed an association between knowledge in nutrition and eating habits and obesity, indicating that children with less knowledge and less healthy eating habits were five times more likely to be obese (OR=5.3: 1.1-24.9)35. Thus, it can be seen that both access to healthy foods and food-related knowledge and attitudes interfere in the consumption and nutritional status of individuals.
Regarding the internal consistency, the subscales evaluated showed modest values of the alpha coefficient (0.69; 0.60) and lower than the customarily desired value (0.70). Reasons for the low reliability found in the food security scale may be related to the low variability in participants’ responses and the reduced number of items used. Also, alpha values higher than 0.60 have been considered sufficient in newly constructed questionnaires36, possibly due to an anticipation of issues related to participants’ definition and understanding of the instrument.
Thus, additional cognitive interviews with adolescents are suggested in order to solve potential problems related to the understanding of the items or the proposed response format and to maximize the quality of information obtained37. Other studies evaluating the reliability of food insecurity scales for adolescents found alpha values of 0.776 and 0.4833.


CONCLUSION
It is verified that the psychometric characteristics of ESANa show values within the required standards, indicating, therefore, the feasibility of combining items based on access to food with others related to attitudes and feeding practices. This study was based on the need to provide an instrument to better guide the elaboration of policies and programs to promote food and nutritional security since the proposed specific scales for the food and nutritional components allow the identification of strategic areas of performance. The classification of adolescents at high risk of food insecurity indicates the need to implement emergency programs or strategies for coping with hunger. The classification of adolescents with a low perception of nutritional security suggests the need for educational programs that promote knowledge, attitudes and practices consistent with the adoption of healthy food.
Despite the merits of ESANa, some limitations may be mentioned. First, the fact that data from students from nine schools in five of the six administrative regions of the city were collected from different socioeconomic strata was not enough to ensure more heterogeneity of the sample, thus limiting any generalization. Second, the reliability of the instrument was also lower than desired, suggesting additional cognitive interviews with adolescents to solve potential issues related to the comprehension of the items or the response format adopted.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel for the scholarship granted, as well as the Municipal Education Secretariat of Fortaleza and the directors and coordinators of the participating schools for their collaboration.
Declaration of authorship:
MRLV: responsible for the concept and design of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation, writing, review and final approval of the manuscript. WSS: responsible for the review of the design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, and review and final approval of the manuscript. JAPJ: responsible for the review of data analysis and interpretation, and review and final approval of the manuscript. RBD: responsible for the review and final approval of the manuscript. MMMA: responsible for the review of the design of the study and data interpretation, and review and final approval of the manuscript.

REFERENCES
1. Stang J, Story M. Adolescent Growth and Development. In: Story M, Stang J, organizadores. Guidelines for adolescent nutrition services. Minneapolis: Center for Leadership, Education and Training in Maternal and Child Nutrition, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota; 2005. p. 1-8.
2. Guerra LD da Silva. Espinosa MM, Bezerra ACD, Guimarães LV, Lima-Lopes MA. Insegurança alimentar em domicílios com adolescentes da Amazônia Legal Brasileira: prevalência e fatores associados. Cad. Saúde Pública 2013; 29(2): 335-348.
3. Organização das Nações Unidas para Alimentação e Agricultura (FAO). Declaração de Roma Sobre a Segurança Alimentar Mundial e Plano de Acção da Cimeira Mundial da Alimentação, World Food Summit, Rome, 1996.
WHO Technical Report Series, Geneva, 1995, 462 p.
4. Widome R, Neumark-sztainer D, Hannan PJ, Haines J, Story M. Eating when there is not enough to eat: eating behaviors and perceptions of food among food-insecure youths. Am J Public Health 2009; 99(5): 822-828.
5. Casey PH, Szeto K L, Robbins JM, Stuff JE, Connell C, Gossett J, Simpson PM. Child health-related quality of life and household food security. Arch Pediatr 2005; 159(1): 51-56, 2005.
6. Gulliford MC, Mahabir D, Nunes C, Rocke B. Self-administration of a food security scale by adolescents: item functioning, socio-economic position and food intakes. Public Health Nutr 2005; 8(7): 853-860.
7. Jones AD, Ngure FM, Pelto G, Young SL. What Are We Assessing When We Measure Food Security? A Compendium and Review of Current Metrics. Advances in Nutrition 2013; 4(5): 481–505
8. Bickel G, Nord M, Price C, Hamilton W, Cook J. Guide to measuring household food security in the United States: Revised 2000. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; 2000. 76p.
9. Coelho SEAC, Vianna RFT, Segall-Correa AM, Perez-Escamilla R, Gubert, MB. Insegurança alimentar entre adolescentes brasileiros: um estudo de validação da Escala Curta de Insegurança Alimentar. Rev. Nutr 2015; 28(4) 385-395.
10. Fram MS, Frongillo EA, Draper C, Fishbein E. Development and validation of a child-report assessment of childhood food insecurity and comparison to parent-report assessment. Mississipi (MS): Southern Rural Development Center; 2012.
11. Oliveira JS, Lira PIC, Veras ICL, Maia SR, Lemos MCC, Andrade SLLS, Viana Junior MJ, Pinto FCL, Leal VS, Batista Filho M. Estado nutricional e insegurança alimentar de adolescentes e adultos em duas localidades de baixo índice de desenvolvimento humano. Rev. Nutr 2009; 22(4), 453-465.
12. Aker J, Lemtouni A. A framework for assessing food security in face of globalization: the case of Morroco. Agroalimentaria 1999; 8(13), 13-26.
13. Polit D, Beck CT, Hungler B. Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem: métodos, avaliação e utilização. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2004. 487p.
14. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílio – PNAD 2009. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2009.
15. Hair JR, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6ª ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006. 928p.
16. Segall-Corrêa AM, Pérez-Escamilla R, Maranha LK, Sampaio MFA, Yuyama L, Alencar F, Vianna RPT, Vieira ACF, Coitinho D, Schmitz BS, Leão MM, Gubert M. Acompanhamento e avaliação da segurança alimentar de famílias brasileiras: validação de metodologia e de instrumento de coleta de informação. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde, Ministério de Saúde; 2003. (Relatório Técnico).
17. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde - Departamento de Atenção Básica. Orientações para a coleta e análise de dados antropométricos em serviços de saúde: Norma Técnica do Sistema de Vigilância Alimentar e Nutricional - SISVAN. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2011.
18. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry: report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series, Geneva, 1995, 462 p.
19. Pérez-Escamilla R, Segall-Corrêa AM, Kurdian ML, Sampaio MFA, Marín-León L, Panigassi G. An Adapted Version of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Insecurity Module Is a Valid Tool for Assessing Household Food Insecurity in Campinas, Brazil. J Nutr 2004; 134(8): 1923-1928.
20. Smith LC, Obeid AEE, Jensen HH. The geography and causes of food insecurity in developing countries. Agric Econ 2000; 22(2): 199-215, 2000.
21. Jayanti RK, Burns AC. The antecedents of preventive health care behavior: An empirical study. J Acad Mark Sci 1998; 26(1):6-15.
22. Burity V, Franceschini T, Valente F, Recine E, Leão M, Carvalho MF. Direito humano à alimentação adequada no contexto da segurança alimentar e nutricional. Brasília: ABRANDH; 2010.
23. Fehring RJ. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart Lung 1987; 16(6).
24. Handcock MS, Gile KJ. On the Concept of Snowball Sampling. Sociol Methodol 2011; 41(1):367-371.
25. Hernández-Nieto RA. Contributions to statistical analysis. Mérida: Universidade Los Andes; 2002.
26. Dias CA. Grupo Focal: Técnica de coleta de dados em pesquisas qualitativas. Inf. & Soc.: Est 2000; 10(2), 7-22.
27. Kaiser HF. The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20(1): 141-151.
28. Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin 1974; 81(6): 358-361.
29. CattelL RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1966; 1(1): 245-276.
30. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Osterlind SJ. Using multivariate statistics. New York: Pearsons; 2001.
31. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde/Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução 196/1996. Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília; 1996.
32. Toral N, Conti MA, Slater B. A alimentação saudável na ótica dos adolescentes: percepções e barreiras à sua implementação e características esperadas em materiais educativos. Cad. Saúde Pública 2009; 25(11):2386-2394.
33. Connell CL, Nord M, Lofton KL, Yadrick K. Food Security of Older Children Can Be Assessed Using a Standardized Survey Instrument. J. Nutr 2004; 34(10): 2566-2572.
34. Panigassi G, Segall-corrêa AM, Marin-León L, Pérez-Escamilla R, Maranha LK, Sampaio M FA. Insegurança alimentar intrafamiliar e perfil de consumo de alimentos. Rev. Nutr 2008; 21(0): 135-144.
35. Trichesa R, Giuglianib ERJ. Obesidade, práticas alimentares e conhecimentos de nutrição em escolares. Rev Saúde Pública 2005; 39(4): 541-547.
36. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2ª ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. 640p.
37. Pergher GK, Stein LM. Entrevista cognitiva e terapia cognitivo-comportamental: do âmbito forense à clínica. Rev. bras.ter. cogn 2005; 1(2): 11-20.