• Alberto Infante - Infante, A. - Madrid, Outro País/Another Country - Escuela Nacional de Sanidad Instituto de Salud Carlos III - <ainfante@isciii.es>
Coautor(es):
• Adriana Cavalcanti de Aguiar - Aguiar, AC - Fiocruz, Universidade Estácio de Sá, IMS/UERJ - <aguiaradri@gmail.com>
Área Temática:
Políticas em Saúde
Resumo:
El Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS) español, creado en 1986, tiene como uno de sus pilares la atención primaria de salud (APS). Desde su nacimiento, el modelo español de APS ha sido objeto de elogios y de críticas. El actual momento de crisis de financiación de las políticas públicas, entre ellas la de salud, está resucitando viejos debates y planteando otros nuevos. El presente artículo examina los datos que se conocen sobre el grado de aceptación del modelo de APS por parte de los ciudadanos españoles, así como datos del debate de administraciones, pacientes y profesionales durante los últimos cinco años. Al final, los autores tratan de extraer algunas conclusiones que los decisores políticos deberían tener en cuenta para, partiendo de las fortalezas y debilidades comúnmente admitidas del modelo de APS, hacer frente a la difícil situación actual evitando errores derivados de decisiones improvisadas a causa de las urgencias del momento.
Palavras-chave:
Políticas de Salud
Atención Primaria en Salud
Indicadores de Salud
Abstract:
Created in 1986, the Spanish National Health System adopted Primary Health Care (PHC) as one of its building blocks. Since the beginning, the Spanish PHC model has been subjected to both praise and criticism. Today, a crisis in public policies funding, including health policies, has resurrected old debates and raised new ones. The present paper analyses the available data about the degree of acceptance of PHC from the perspective of Spanish citizens as well as data about the debate produced in the last five years by politicians, patients and health workers. By the end of the paper the authors make some inferences that decision-makers ought to take into consideration in order to, taking off from the strengths and weakness of PHC model usually acknowledged, avoiding mistakes caused by improvised decisions caused by conjunctural urgencies.
Keywords:
Health Policy
Primary Health Care
Health Indicators
IS IT NECESSARY A SECOND REFORM OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE IN SPAIN?
Resumo (abstract):
Created in 1986, the Spanish National Health System adopted Primary Health Care (PHC) as one of its building blocks. Since the beginning, the Spanish PHC model has been subjected to both praise and criticism. Today, a crisis in public policies funding, including health policies, has resurrected old debates and raised new ones. The present paper analyses the available data about the degree of acceptance of PHC from the perspective of Spanish citizens as well as data about the debate produced in the last five years by politicians, patients and health workers. By the end of the paper the authors make some inferences that decision-makers ought to take into consideration in order to, taking off from the strengths and weakness of PHC model usually acknowledged, avoiding mistakes caused by improvised decisions caused by conjunctural urgencies.
Palavras-chave (keywords):
Health Policy
Primary Health Care
Health Indicators
Infante, A., Aguiar, AC. ¿ES NECESARIA UNA SEGUNDA REFORMA DE LA ATENCIÓN PRIMARIA EN ESPAÑA?. Cien Saude Colet [periódico na internet] (2012/mai). [Citado em 23/01/2025].
Está disponível em: http://cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.br/artigos/es-necesaria-una-segunda-reforma-de-la-atencion-primaria-en-espana/10222?id=10222
