0115/2021 - Sobre risco, violência e gênero: revisão da produção da saúde sobre o sexting entre jovens (A debate about risk, violence and gender: review of health production on sexting among youth)
Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática acerca da produção do campo da saúde sobre o sexting entre 2009 e 2019. Buscou-se analisar a produção científica com relação ao seu contexto de produção (gênero da primeira autoria, ano da publicação e país de realização), tipo de publicação, área do conhecimento, temas e sujeitos abordados e qual concepção apresentam sobre o sexting. Foram analisadas, durante o segundo semestre de 2019, as 147 publicações disponíveis no Pubmed, que tinham o sexting como tema central. A busca foi feita pelo termo sexting. Foi realizada análise de estatística descritiva que envolveu um cunho interpretativo, de modo a avaliar a abordagem do risco, da violência e de gênero nessas publicações. A maioria delas tem mulheres como primeiras autoras, foi produzida nos Estados Unidos entre 2017 e 2019 e realizou abordagem quantitativa (aproximadamente 65%). Cerca de metade das produções teve como tema central a prevalência do sexting ou o comportamento de risco entre adolescentes. A grande maioria atribuiu de algum modo ao sexting um comportamento de risco, e do qual se deduz violência (70%). Uma pequena parte das publicações apresentou uma abordagem de gênero (menos de 15%). Ao não distinguir práticas saudáveis de violentas, as produções do campo da saúde têm realizado análises insuficientes do sexting.
Palavras-chave:
sexualidade, internet, jovens, saúde, gênero
Abstract:
It is a systematic review on the production of the health field on sexting between 2009 and 2019. The scientific production was analyzed in relation to its context (gender of the first author, year of publication and country of realization), type of publication, area of knowledge, themes and subjects focused and the conception they present about sexting. During the second semester of 2019, the 147 publications available on Pubmed, which had sexting as a central theme, were analyzed. The search was made by the term sexting. A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out, which involved an interpretive nature in order to assess the approach to risk, violence and gender in these publications. Most publications have women as the first authors, were produced in the United States between 2017 and 2019 and carried out a quantitative approach (approximately 65%). Almost half of the productions had as a central theme the prevalence of sexting or risky behavior among adolescents. The vast majority also attributed risky behavior to sexting in some way,which violence can be inferred (70%). A little part of publications presented a gender approach (less than 15%). By not distinguishing healthyviolent practices, the productions in the health field have performed insufficient analysis of sexting.
(A debate about risk, violence and gender: review of health production on sexting among youth)
Resumo (abstract):
It is a systematic review on the production of the health field on sexting between 2009 and 2019. The scientific production was analyzed in relation to its context (gender of the first author, year of publication and country of realization), type of publication, area of knowledge, themes and subjects focused and the conception they present about sexting. During the second semester of 2019, the 147 publications available on Pubmed, which had sexting as a central theme, were analyzed. The search was made by the term sexting. A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out, which involved an interpretive nature in order to assess the approach to risk, violence and gender in these publications. Most publications have women as the first authors, were produced in the United States between 2017 and 2019 and carried out a quantitative approach (approximately 65%). Almost half of the productions had as a central theme the prevalence of sexting or risky behavior among adolescents. The vast majority also attributed risky behavior to sexting in some way,which violence can be inferred (70%). A little part of publications presented a gender approach (less than 15%). By not distinguishing healthyviolent practices, the productions in the health field have performed insufficient analysis of sexting.
Patrocino, L. B., Bevilacqua, P.D.. Sobre risco, violência e gênero: revisão da produção da saúde sobre o sexting entre jovens. Cien Saude Colet [periódico na internet] (2021/abr). [Citado em 02/01/2025].
Está disponível em: http://cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.br/artigos/sobre-risco-violencia-e-genero-revisao-da-producao-da-saude-sobre-o-sexting-entre-jovens/18014?id=18014
